|
Preventing
Lung Disease in Workers Who Use or Make Flavorings
- NIOSH Publication No. 2004-110
|
WARNING!
Breathing certain flavoring chemicals in the
workplace may lead to severe lung disease.
|
The
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) requests assistance in preventing lung disease
and other health effects in workers who use or make
flavorings. The occurrence of severe lung disease in
workers who make flavorings or use them to produce microwave
popcorn has revealed an unrecognized occupational health
risk. Flavorings are often complex mixtures of many
chemicals [Conning 2000]. The safety of these chemicals
is usually established for humans consuming small amounts
in food [Pollitt 2000], not for food industry workers
inhaling them. Production workers employed by flavoring
manufacturers (or those who use flavorings in the production
process) often handle a large number of chemicals, many
of which can be highly irritating to breathe in high
concentrations.
This
Alert describes health effects that may occur because
of workplace exposure to some flavorings or their ingredients,
gives examples of workplace settings in which illness
has occurred, and recommends steps that companies and
workers should take to prevent hazardous exposures.
BACKGROUND
NIOSH
has investigated the occurrence of severe lung disease
in workers at a microwave popcorn packaging plant. Eight
former workers at this plant developed illness characterized
by fixed airways obstruction on lung function tests
[Akpinar-Elci et al. 2002]. An evaluation of the current
workforce at this plant showed an association between
exposure to vapors from flavorings used in the production
process and decreased lung function [Kreiss et al. 2002a].
Similar fixed obstructive lung disease has also occurred
in workers at other plants that use or manufacture flavorings
[NIOSH 1986; Lockey et al. 2002]. In animal tests, inhaling
vapors from a heated butter flavoring used in microwave
popcorn production caused severe injury to airways [Hubbs
et al. 2002a].
Medical
test results in affected workers (including some lung
biopsy results) are consistent with bronchiolitis obliterans,
an uncommon lung disease characterized by fixed airways
obstruction [Akpinar-Elci et al. 2002]. In bronchiolitis
obliterans, inflammation and scarring occur in the smallest
airways of the lung and can lead to severe and disabling
shortness of breath. The disease has many known causes
such as inhalation of certain chemicals, certain bacterial
and viral infections, organ transplantation, and reactions
to certain medications [King 2000]. Known causes of
bronchiolitis obliterans due to occupational or other
environmental exposures include gases such as nitrogen
oxides (e.g., silo gas), sulfur dioxide, chlorine, ammonia,
phosgene, and other irritant gases [King 1998]. Recent
NIOSH investigations strongly suggest that some flavoring
chemicals can also cause bronchiolitis obliterans in
the workplace. (Some workers exposed to flavorings in
one of these plants were also found to have occupational
asthma.)
HEALTH
EFFECTS
The
main respiratory symptoms experienced by workers affected
by fixed airways obstruction include cough (usually
without phlegm) and shortness of breath on exertion.
These symptoms typically do not improve when the worker
goes home at the end of the workday or on weekends or
vacations. The severity of the lung symptoms can range
from only a mild cough to severe cough and shortness
of breath on exertion. Usually these symptoms are gradual
in onset and progressive, but severe symptoms can occur
suddenly. Some workers may experience fever, night sweats,
and weight loss. Before arriving at a final diagnosis,
doctors of affected workers initially thought that the
symptoms might be due to asthma, chronic bronchitis,
emphysema, pneumonia, or smoking. Severe cases may not
respond to medical treatment. Affected workers generally
notice a gradual reduction or cessation of cough years
after they are no longer exposed to flavoring vapors,
but shortness of breath on exertion persists. Several
with very severe disease were placed on lung transplant
waiting lists. Workers exposed to flavorings may also
experience eye, nose, throat, and skin irritation. In
some cases, chemical eye burns have required medical
treatment.
Medical
Evaluation
Medical
testing may reveal several of the following findings:
- Spirometry,
a type of breathing test,
- most
often shows fixed airways obstruction (i.e.,
difficulty blowing air out fast and no improvement
with asthma medications), and
- sometimes
shows restriction (i.e., decreased ability to
fully expand the lungs).
- Lung
volumes may show hyperinflation (i.e., too much
air in the lungs due to air trapping beyond obstructed
airways).
- Diffusing
capacity of the lung (DLCO) is generally normal,
especially early in the disease.
- Chest
X-rays are usually normal but may show hyperinflation.
- High-resolution
computerized tomography scans of the chest at full
inspiration and expiration may reveal heterogeneous
air trapping on the expiratory view as well as haziness
and thickened airway walls.
- Lung
biopsies may reveal evidence of constrictive bronchiolitis
obliterans (i.e., severe narrowing or complete obstruction
of the small airways). An open lung biopsy, such
as by thoracoscopy, is more likely to be diagnostic
than a transbronchial biopsy. Special processing,
staining, and review of multiple tissue sections
may be necessary for a diagnosis.
CURRENT
EXPOSURE LIMITS
Flavorings
are composed of various natural and manmade substances.
They may consist of a single substance, but more often
they are complex mixtures of several substances. The
Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association evaluates
flavoring ingredients to determine whether they are
“generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) under
the conditions of intended use through food consumption.
Though considered safe to eat, ingredients may be harmful
to breathe in the forms and concentrations to which
food and chemical industry workers may be exposed.
Occupational
exposure guidelines have been developed for only a small
number of the thousands of ingredients used in flavorings.
For example, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) permissible exposure limits (PELs) and/or NIOSH
recommended exposure limits (RELs) have been established
for only 46 (<5%) of the 1,037 flavoring ingredients
considered by the flavorings industry to represent potential
respiratory hazards due to possible volatility and irritant
properties (alpha, beta-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones,
aliphatic aldehydes, aliphatic carboxylic acids, aliphatic
amines, and aliphatic aromatic thiols and sulfides)
[Hallagan 2002] (see Appendix). Material safety data
sheets (MSDSs) contain information about known occupational
hazards of specific chemicals, but they may not be based
on the most up-to-date information in the case of newly
recognized occupational health risks.
CASE
CLUSTER REPORTS
Case
Cluster 1
Four
men and four women, aged 29 to 53, who had worked at
a single microwave popcorn packaging plant (popcorn
plant A) developed fixed obstructive airways disease.
One of these former workers and another worker later
identified at the same plant had lung biopsy findings
consistent with bronchiolitis obliterans [Akpinar-Elci
et al. 2002]. The cases occurred sporadically over several
years. Four had worked as mixers of a heated soybean
oil, salt, and butter flavoring mixture; the butter
flavoring was poured by hand from open buckets into
open mixing tanks (see Figure 1). The other four had
packaged microwave popcorn near the room where the oil
and flavorings were mixed. Five had never smoked or
smoked very little. Initial symptoms included cough,
shortness of breath on exertion, and wheeze. Most had
gradual onset of symptoms between 5 months and 5 years
after starting work at the plant. Spirometry testing
revealed severe airways obstruction in six workers.
All eight had normal chest X-rays; four of six tested
had normal DLCOs. Medical treatment with corticosteroid
medication was not effective. Most had severe disease
by the time they were referred to lung specialists and
four were placed on lung transplant lists. Their coughs
diminished months to years after leaving employment,
but their shortness of breath on exertion did not.
Spirometry
tests of 117 of 135 current workers employed at this
plant revealed that the number of workers with airways
obstruction was 3 times higher than expected [Kreiss
et al. 2002a]. Almost all chest X-rays and DLCOs in
these workers were normal. Workers with greater past
exposure to flavoring vapors were significantly more
likely to have abnormal spirometry test results than
those with less exposure. Quality control workers, each
of whom popped about 100 bags of microwave popcorn each
shift in a small room with little ventilation, also
had higher rates of abnormal lung function. Many workers
also reported developing skin problems after starting
work at the plant.
Case
Cluster 2
Five
workers at a flavorings manufacturing company developed
fixed airways obstruction [Lockey et al. 2002]. All
five affected workers were relatively young and none
smoked. One was a 38-year-old worker who became short
of breath and started coughing within seconds after
adding 30 gallons of acetaldehyde to a flavoring mixture.
Her shortness of breath resolved after a few minutes,
but her cough persisted. Two months later, she noted
shortness of breath on exertion. Spirometry tests done
after the onset of symptoms showed fixed airways obstruction;
spirometry test results before starting work at the
plant had been normal. She did not respond to treatment
with medications. Similar symptoms were experienced
by the other four workers who developed fixed airways
obstruction while working at the plant. No further lung
function loss was noted over several years after removal
from exposure.
Case
Cluster 3
Two
young, nonsmoking, previously healthy workers at a plant
producing flavorings for the baking industry developed
severe fixed airways obstruction within several months
of starting to work at the plant [NIOSH 1986]. Both
worked in a room where liquid and powdered flavorings
were combined with starch and flour in large mixers.
Both developed shortness of breath on exertion and persistent
cough. Spirometry tests revealed severe fixed airways
obstruction. DLCOs and chest X-rays were normal. Neither
worker had a significant clinical improvement in response
to bronchodilator and corticosteroid medications. After
being away from the workplace for several months, both
affected workers had persistent severe shortness of
breath on exertion. Two former mixing room workers who
were tested were also found to have mild to moderate
airways obstruction.
Case
Cluster 4
A
54-year-old mixer of oil and butter flavorings at a
microwave popcorn plant (popcorn plant B) was referred
for evaluation of a chronic cough [Parmet and Von Essen
2002]. Spirometry tests indicated fixed airways obstruction.
This worker reported having a chronic cough since beginning
work at the plant 3 years earlier. His cough became
noticeably worse when he used a new butter flavoring
mixture. He experienced some improvement in respiratory
symptoms and lung function with cessation of exposure
and treatment with corticosteroid medication. Five of
the six workers exposed to flavoring vapors in the plant
developed chemical eye burns after using the new flavoring
mixture. Their eye problems resolved over several weeks
with medical treatment and cessation of exposure [Kanwal
2002a].
Case
Cluster 5
A
NIOSH investigation at a microwave popcorn plant (popcorn
plant C) found an obstructive pattern on lung function
testing in 11 of 41 production workers—between
2 and 3 times the number expected. The obstruction was
fixed (i.e., did not respond to bronchodilator medication),
and DLCO was normal in most of the affected workers
who underwent diffusing capacity testing. In this plant,
the mixing and holding tanks for heated oil and butter
flavoring were located in a room where the packaging
lines and all production workers were also located [Sahakian
2003].
Case
Cluster 6
A
37 year-old mixer of heated soybean oil and flavorings
at a microwave popcorn plant (popcorn plant D) was found
to have severe fixed airways obstruction. He had worked
as mixer for 7 years. Spirometry testing done during
his first 3 years as a mixer revealed that his lung
function was declining at a greater than expected rate.
He developed progressive shortness of breath on exertion
starting in his fourth year as a mixer. In this plant,
the mixing and holding tanks for heated soybean oil
and flavorings have local exhaust ventilation and are
located in a room that has separate ventilation from
the rest of the plant. A NIOSH investigation found an
excess of abnormal spirometry tests among current workers
who had worked as mixers (6 of 13; half with fixed obstruction).
No significant excess of spirometry abnormalities was
found among packaging line workers. Respirators (protective
breathing masks) were provided but not always used by
mixers when exposed to flavorings [Kanwal 2002b].
CONCLUSIONS
Case
clusters of fixed obstructive lung disease, one with
biopsy evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans, have been
documented among workers at several different plants
where flavorings are used or where chemicals are handled
in the production of flavorings. Recent attention has
been largely focused on workers exposed to volatile
chemicals in butter flavorings at microwave popcorn
plants, but other reports indicate that other flavoring
and food manufacturing workers exposed to various flavorings
may also be at risk.
Little
is currently known about which chemicals used in flavorings
have the potential to cause lung disease and other health
effects, and what workplace exposure concentrations
are safe. As part of ongoing investigations into airways
disease in microwave popcorn workers, NIOSH has recently
undertaken animal experiments to evaluate individual
butter flavoring chemicals. Results of an animal study
indicate that exposure to vapors from diacetyl, a chemical
used to impart butter-like flavor, causes airway injury,
though perhaps to a smaller extent than that caused
by exposure to vapors from the intact butter flavoring
mixture itself [Kreiss et al. 2002b; Hubbs et al. 2002b].
Most
chemicals used in flavorings have not been tested for
respiratory toxicity via the inhalation route, and occupational
exposure limits have been established for only a relatively
small number of these chemicals. Although much remains
unknown regarding the toxicity of flavoring-related
chemicals, employers and workers can take steps to address
working conditions and work practices that place workers
at risk.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The
following recommendations are provided to reduce hazardous
exposures associated with the use or manufacture of
flavorings. In general, NIOSH recommends that employers
and workers implement controls to limit worker exposure.
In order of preference, the major types of controls
include the following:
- Substitution
- Engineering
controls
- Administrative
controls
- Education
- Personal
protective equipment
- Exposure
and worker health monitoring
Substitution
Substituting
a less hazardous material can effectively reduce an
existing hazard. However, substitution does not always
represent a feasible or definitive approach. An adequate
substitute may not exist; or, as with flavoring mixtures,
the exposures may be complex and toxicities may be inadequately
understood. Therefore, do the following when considering
substitution:
- Exercise
extreme care when selecting substitutes.
- Consider
the possible adverse health effects of any candidate
substitutes.
- Remember
that as a general rule, flavoring formulations designed
to release less volatile chemicals or respirable
powder into the air during handling may pose less
risk to workers.
Engineering
Controls
Engineering
controls are the primary methods for minimizing exposure
associated with the use or manufacture of potentially
hazardous flavorings. Examples include closed production
systems (e.g., to eliminate handling open containers
of flavorings or their chemical ingredients for placement
into mixing tanks), adequate ventilation, and isolation.
- Whenever
possible, use closed processes to transfer flavorings
or their chemical ingredients.
- Isolate
the mixing room and other areas where flavorings
and their ingredients are openly handled. Maintain
these work areas under negative air pressure relative
to the rest of the plant.
- Use
local exhaust ventilation of tanks and other sources
of potential exposure (e.g., places where flavorings
are openly weighed or measured) as well as general
dilution ventilation of the work area to eliminate
or reduce possible worker exposures. Obtain information
about the design of appropriate ventilation systems
from a qualified ventilation engineer or from Industrial
Ventilation—A Manual of Recommended Practice
[ACGIH 2001].
- Check
ventilation equipment regularly for adequate performance,
especially in areas where flavorings and their ingredients
are handled (e.g., mixing room) and in adjacent
work areas. Also perform checks whenever a process
change is made or a problem is suspected.
- For
processes involving heating of flavorings, keep
the temperature as low as possible to minimize emissions
of volatile chemicals into the air.
Administrative
Controls
- Establish
and enforce work practices to limit release of chemicals
and dust into the workplace air when flavorings
or their ingredients are handled.
- Tightly
seal containers with unused or residual amounts
of flavorings or their ingredients.
- Maintain
good general housekeeping in any areas where flavorings
or their ingredients are handled.
- Establish
standard procedures for cleaning the workplace,
tanks and other containers, and spills.
- Do
not use compressed air for cleaning powdered
flavorings or ingredients, as this will increase
concentrations of airborne particulate.
- Use
special caution when removing residual chemicals
from tanks and other containers with steam or
hot water, as this may increase exposure to
volatile chemical vapors.
- Clean
up spills of flavorings or their ingredients
promptly using procedures and appropriate protective
equipment designed to limit exposure.
- Restrict
access to all areas where flavorings are openly
handled; only essential workers should enter these
areas and only when properly protected (see section
on personal protective equipment).
Employer
and Worker Education
Employer
awareness of hazardous exposures in the production process
and communication of this information to workers are
vital elements in an optimal occupational safety and
health program.
- Inform
workers about any materials that may contain flavoring
agents and tell them the nature of the hazard.
- Provide
general information and specific hazard warnings
through workplace postings, container labeling,
MSDSs, and training.
- Train
workers regarding the means available at the facility
to eliminate or limit exposure and how they can
take action to limit potential exposures for themselves
and fellow workers.
- Inform
workers about symptoms that may indicate a flavoring-related
health problem. Advise them to report these symptoms
to their supervisors and physicians.
Personal
Protective Equipment
Whenever
the substances and amounts present in a plant or work
area pose a potential hazard, provide personal protective
equipment to protect workers from skin, eye, and respiratory
tract irritation and other adverse health effects.
Skin
and eye protection
- Enforce
the use of chemical-resistant gloves and tight-fitting
goggles for workers with potential skin and eye
exposure to irritant flavorings or their chemical
ingredients.
- Establish
specific guidance about when to use the equipment
for each job, based on knowledge of the tasks performed,
substances involved, and an assessment of potential
exposures.
Respiratory
protection
The
use of respirators is the least preferred method of
controlling worker exposures to respiratory hazards.
- Do
not use respirators as the primary control for routine
operations. However, they may be needed and used
while optimal engineering controls and work practices
are being implemented, during some short-duration
maintenance procedures, and during emergencies.
- Use
respirators for exposure situations in which even
the lowest concentrations achievable with engineering
controls are still associated with risk (see section
on worker health monitoring).
- The
minimum protective respirator that should be used
for workers exposed to flavorings or their chemical
ingredients is a NIOSH-certified half-mask, negative-pressure
respirator with organic vapor cartridges or canisters
and particulate filters.
- Use
a full-facepiece respirator for eye protection as
well as additional respiratory protection.
- Consider
other respirators for workers exposed to flavorings
or their chemical ingredients: powered, air-purifying
respirators (with organic vapor cartridges or canisters
and particulate filters) and, for maximum respiratory
protection, supplied-air respirators.
- Before
using respirators, set up a written respiratory
protection program that meets the requirements of
the OSHA respiratory protection standard [29 CFR*1910.134].
- Designate
a trained employee or supervisor to run the program
and evaluate its effectiveness. Make sure that the
designated person’s training or experience
is appropriate to the level of complexity of the
program.
- Ensure
that respirators selected for use are certified
by NIOSH according to 42 CFR 84.
- Implement
a change schedule for canisters and cartridges based
on objective information or data that will ensure
that canisters and cartridges are changed before
the end of their service lives.
- Include
the following in the respiratory protection program:
- Procedures
for selecting respirators
- Medical
evaluations of workers required to use respirators
- Fit-testing
procedures for tight-fitting respirators
- Procedures
for proper use of respirators in routine and
reasonably foreseeable emergency situations
- Procedures
and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing,
inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise
maintaining respirators
- Procedures
to ensure adequate quality, quantity, and flow
of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators
- Training
of workers in the respiratory hazards to which
they are potentially exposed during routine
and emergency situations
- Training
of workers in the proper use of respirators,
including putting them on and removing them,
any limitations on their use, and their maintenance
- Procedures
for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of
the program and worker compliance with program
requirements
*Code
of Federal Regulations. See CFR in references.
Exposure
Monitoring
- Engage
the services of a certified air sampling expert
to identify the volatile flavoring chemicals that
are present in significant amounts in the air, and
to measure the air concentrations of one or more
of these chemicals as indicators of exposure.
- When
applicable, measure air concentrations of total
respirable dust and the air concentration of any
flavoring chemical with an OSHA PEL or a NIOSH REL.
- Use
repeated monitoring to determine whether new engineering
controls or changes in work practices are effectively
reducing exposures.
- Continue
routine monitoring on a regular basis to ensure
the continuing effectiveness of controls.
- If
monitoring indicates that exposure concentrations
have increased, thoroughly investigate engineering
controls to identify problems and guide remedial
actions.
Worker
Health Monitoring
- Implement
preplacement and regularly scheduled ascertainment
of symptoms and spirometry testing of lung function
for all workers with potentially hazardous exposure
to flavorings or flavoring ingredients.
- Follow
the latest American Thoracic Society guidelines
[ATS 1995] for spirometry testing.
- Perform
testing at least annually, since existing information
makes it difficult to specify the interval between
testing. The relatively rapid onset of severe airways
obstruction in some affected workers suggests that
more frequent intervals (perhaps every 3 months)
may be appropriate in some situations.
- Conduct
more frequent testing if abnormalities related to
flavoring exposure are detected in a particular
workforce. Regardless, workers should not wait for
regularly scheduled testing to report symptoms.
- Promptly
refer workers for further medical evaluation if
they have persistent cough; persistent shortness
of breath on exertion; frequent or persistent symptoms
of eye, nose, throat, or skin irritation; abnormal
lung function on spirometry testing; or accelerated
decline in lung function. Provide the evaluating
physician with a copy of this Alert. The intent
is to identify and prevent progression of work-related
medical conditions. The physician should advise
the worker about any suspected or confirmed medical
condition that may be caused or aggravated by work
exposures, about recommendations for further evaluation
and treatment, and specifically about any recommended
restriction of the worker’s exposure (including
removal from the workplace) or use of personal protective
equipment. The physician should provide the employer
with information about recommended restrictions
of the worker’s exposure or use of personal
protective equipment.
- Do
not rely on the absence of respiratory symptoms
that occur in relation to work exposures to indicate
that exposures are adequately controlled. In contrast
to workers with work-related asthma, few if any
workers with fixed airways obstruction from exposure
to flavorings report improvement on days off work
or during vacations. Also, flavoring-exposed workers
who develop fixed airways obstruction may not have
symptoms early in the course of their illness. Regularly
scheduled spirometry is currently the best available
test for early recognition of decreasing or abnormal
lung function from occupational exposure to flavorings
or their ingredients.
Surveillance
and Disease Reporting
- Assess
the patterns of reported symptoms, abnormal spirometry,
physician- advised exposure restrictions, and other
available information about health effects within
the workforce to identify areas, processes, and
exposures that may require more intensive intervention
to control exposures and prevent further adverse
health effects.
Physicians,
workers, and employers should report to the NIOSH Division
of Respiratory Disease Studies (800–232–2114)
and their State health department any cases of lung
disease with fixed airways obstruction or any other
significant work-related lung disease in workers exposed
to flavorings or flavoring ingredients. The information
from such reports can help identify high-risk work settings
and guide efforts to prevent additional cases.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The
principle contributors to this Alert were Richard Kanwal,
Greg Kullman, Kathleen Kreiss, Robert Castellan, Joe
Burkhart, Kenneth Hilsbos, Muge Akpinar-Elci, Chris
Piacitelli, and Randy Boylstein. The Flavor and Extract
Manufacturers Association of the United States reviewed
a draft of this document and provided helpful comments
and suggestions. Please direct comments, questions,
or requests for additional information to the following:
Director
Division of Respiratory Disease Studies
National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health
1095 Willowdale Road, Suite 2900
Morgantown, WV 26505
Telephone:
(304) 285–5705; or call 1–800–35–NIOSH.
We
greatly appreciate your assistance in protecting the
health of U.S. workers.
John
Howard, M.D.
Director
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
REFERENCES
ACGIH
[2001]. Industrial ventilation: a manual of recommended
practice. 24th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference
of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
Akpinar-Elci
M, Kanwal R, Kreiss K [2002]. Bronchiolitis obliterans
syndrome in popcorn plant workers. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 165:A526.
ATS
[1995]. Standardization of spirometry. Am Rev Respir
Crit Care Med 152:1107–1136.
CFR.
Code of Federal regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, Office of the Federal Register.
Conning
DM [2000]. Toxicology of food and food additives. In:
Ballantyne B, Marrs TC, Syversen T, eds. General and
applied toxicology. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Reference
Ltd., pp. 1977–1992.
Hallagan
JB [2002]. Letter of November 26, 2002, from J.B. Hallagan,
Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association of the
United States, to R. Kanwal, Division of Respiratory
Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Department of Health and Human Services.
Hubbs
AF, Battelli LA, Goldsmith WT, Porter DW, Frazer D,
Friend S, Schwegler-Berry D, Mercer RR, Reynolds JS,
Grote A, Castranova V, Kullman G, Fedan JS, Dowdy J,
Jones WG [2002a]. Necrosis of nasal and airway epithelium
in rats inhaling vapors of artificial butter flavoring.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 185:128–135.
Hubbs
A, Castranova V, Jones W, Porter D, Goldsmith W, Kullman
G, Battelli L, Friend S, Mercer RR, Schwegler-Berry
D, Kreiss K [2002b]. Workplace safety and food ingredients:
the example of butter flavoring. In: Abstracts of papers,
224th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA, August 18–22,
2002. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, AGFD–148.
Kanwal
R [2002a]. Letter of April 19, 2002, from R. Kanwal
and S. Martin, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department
of Health and Human Services, to Keith Heuermann, B.
K. Heuermann Popcorn, Inc., Phillips, Nebraska.
Kanwal
R [2002b]. Letter of November 18, 2002, from R. Kanwal,
Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human
Services, to Greg Hoffman, American Pop Corn Company,
Sioux City, Iowa.
King
TE [1998]. Bronchiolitis. In: Fishman AE, ed. Pulmonary
diseases and disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 825–847.
King
TE [2000]. Bronchiolitis. Eur Respir Mon 14:244–266.
Kreiss
K, Gomaa A, Kullman G, Fedan K, Simoes EJ, Enright PL
[2002a]. Clinical bronchiolitis obliterans in workers
at a microwave-popcorn plant. N Engl J Med 347:330–338.
Kreiss
K, Hubbs A, Kullman G [2002b]. Correspondence: bronchiolitis
in popcorn-factory workers. N Engl J Med 347:1981–1982.
Lockey
J, McKay R, Barth E, Dahlsten J, Baughman R [2002].
Bronchiolitis obliterans in the food flavoring manufacturing
industry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:A461.
NIOSH
[1986]. Hazard evaluation and technical assistance report:
International Bakers Services, Inc., South Bend, IN.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease
Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, NIOSH Report No. HETA 85–171–1710.
Parmet
AJ, Von Essen S [2002]. Rapidly progressive, fixed airway
obstructive disease in popcorn workers: a new occupational
pulmonary illness? J Occup Environ Med 44:216–218.
Pollitt
FD [2000]. Regulation of food additives and food contact
materials. In: Ballantyne B, Marrs TC, Syversen T, eds.
General and applied toxicology. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan
Reference Ltd., pp. 1653–1660.
Sahakian
N [2003]. Letter of January 13, 2003, from N. Sahakian,
Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human
Services, to Gary Sanders, Agrilink Foods, Ridgeway,
Illinois.
APPENDIX
| Flavoring
substances with OSHA PELs and/or NIOSH RELs |
|
FEMA
No.
|
CAS
No.
|
Substance
|
Synonyms*
|
|
2003
|
75-07-0
|
Acetaldehyde
|
Acetic
aldehyde; ethanal; ethyl aldehyde
|
|
2006
|
64-19-7
|
Acetic
acid
|
Acetic
acid (aqueous); glacial acetic acid (pure compound);
ethanoic acid; methane-carboxylic acid
|
|
2055
|
123-92-2
|
Isoamyl
acetate
|
Banana
oil; isopentyl acetate; 3-methyl-1-butanol acetate;
3-methylbutyl ester of acetic acid; 3-methyl-butyl
ethanoate
|
|
2057
|
123-51-3
|
Isoamyl
alcohol
|
Primary
isoamyl alcohol; fermentation amyl alcohol;
fusel oil; isobutyl carbinol; isopentyl alcohol;
3-methyl-1-butanol
|
|
2170
|
78-93-3
|
2-Butanone
|
Ethyl
methyl ketone; MEK; methyl acetone; methyl ethyl
ketone
|
|
2174
|
123-86-4
|
Butyl
acetate
|
n-Butyl
acetate; n-butyl ester of acetic acid; butyl
ethanoate
|
|
2175
|
110-19-0
|
Isobutyl
acetate
|
Isobutyl
ester of acetic acid; 2-methylpropyl acetate;
2-methylpropyl ester of acetic acid; b-methylpropyl
ethanoate
|
|
2178
|
71-36-3
|
Butyl
alcohol
|
n-Butyl
alcohol; 1-butanol; n-butanol; 1-hydroxy-butane;
n-propyl carbinol
|
|
2179
|
78-83-1
|
Isobutyl
alcohol
|
IBA;
isobutanol; isopropylcarbinol; 2-methyl-1-propanol
|
|
2184
|
128-37-0
|
Butylated
hydroxytoluene
|
BHT;
dibutylated hydroxytoluene; 4-methyl-2,6-di-tert-butyl
phenol; 6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol
|
|
2205
|
138-22-7
|
Butyl
lactate
|
n-Butyl
lactate; butyl ester of 2-hydroxypropanoic acid;
butyl ester of lactic acid
|
|
2414
|
141-78-6
|
Ethyl
acetate
|
Acetic
ester; acetic ether; ethyl ester of acetic acid;
ethyl ethanoate
|
|
2418
|
140-88-5
|
Ethyl
acrylate
|
Ethyl
acrylate (inhibited); ethyl ester of acrylic
acid; ethyl propenoate
|
|
2419
|
64-17-5
|
Ethyl
alcohol
|
Alcohol;
ethanol; EtOH; grain alcohol; cologne spirit
|
|
2434
|
109-94-4
|
Ethyl
formate
|
Ethyl
ester of formic acid; ethyl methanoate
|
|
2487
|
64-18-6
|
Formic
acid
|
Formic
acid (85%–95% in aqueous solution); hydrogen
carboxylic acid; methanoic acid
|
|
2489
|
98-01-1
|
Furfural
|
Fural;
2-furancarboxaldehyde; furfuraldehyde; 2-furfuraldehyde
|
|
2491
|
98-00-0
|
Furfuryl
alcohol
|
2-Furylmethanol;
2-hydroxymethylfuran
|
|
2525
|
56-81-5
|
Glycerol
|
Glycerin
(anhydrous); glycyl alcohol; 1,2,3-propanetriol;
trihydroxypropane
|
|
2544
|
110-43-0
|
2-Heptanone
|
Amyl
methyl ketone; n-amyl methyl ketone; methyl
(n-amyl) ketone
|
|
2546
|
123-19-3
|
4-Heptanone
|
Dipropyl
ketone; butyrone; DPK; heptan-4-one; propyl
ketone
|
|
2676
|
79-20-9
|
Methyl
acetate
|
Methyl
ester of acetic acid; methyl ethanoate
|
|
2716
|
74-93-1
|
Methyl
mercaptan
|
Mercaptomethane;
methanethiol; methyl sulfhydrate
|
|
2731
|
108-10-1
|
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
|
Isobutyl
methyl ketone; methyl isobutyl ketone; MIBK;
hexone
|
|
2842
|
107-87-9
|
2-Pentanone
|
Ethyl
acetone; methyl propyl ketone; MPK
|
|
2924
|
79-09-4
|
Propionic
acid
|
Carboxyethane;
ethane carboxylic acid; ethyl-formic acid; metacetonic
acid; methyl acetic acid; propanoic acid
|
|
2925
|
109-60-4
|
Propyl
acetate
|
n-Propyl
acetate; n-propyl ester of acetic acid
|
|
2926
|
108-21-4
|
Isopropyl
acetate
|
Isopropyl
ester of acetic acid; 1-methylethyl ester of
acetic acid; 2-propyl acetate
|
|
2928
|
71-23-8
|
Propyl
alcohol
|
n-Propyl
alcohol; ethyl carbinol; 1-propanol; n-propanol
|
|
2929
|
67-63-0
|
Isopropyl
alcohol
|
Dimethyl
carbinol; IPA; isopropanol; 2-propanol; sec-propyl
alcohol; rubbing alcohol
|
|
2966
|
110-86-1
|
Pyridine
|
Azabenzene;
azine
|
|
3098
|
110-62-3
|
Valeraldehyde
|
n-Valeraldehyde;
amyl aldehyde; pentanal; valeral; valeric aldehyde
|
|
3223
|
108-95-2
|
Phenol
|
Carbolic
acid; hydroxybenzene; monohydroxy-benzene; phenyl
alcohol; phenyl hydroxide
|
|
3233
|
100-42-5
|
Styrene
|
Ethenyl
benzene; phenylethylene; styrene monomer; styrol;
vinyl benzene
|
|
3241
|
75-50-3
|
Trimethylamine
|
N,N-Dimethylmethanamine;
TMA
|
|
3326
|
67-64-1
|
Acetone
|
Dimethyl
ketone; ketone propane; 2-propanone
|
|
3368
|
141-79-7
|
4-Methyl-3-penten-2-one
|
Isobutenyl
methyl ketone; isopropylideneacetone; methyl
isobutenyl ketone; mesityl oxide
|
|
3478
|
109-79-5
|
1-Butanethiol
|
Butanethiol;
n-butanethiol; 1-mercaptobutane; n-butyl mercaptan
|
|
3537
|
108-83-8
|
2,6-Dimethyl-4-heptanone
|
Diisobutyl
ketone; DIBK; sym-diisopropyl acetone; isovalerone;
valerone
|
|
3589
|
108-46-3
|
Resorcinol
|
1,3-Benzenediol;
m-benzenediol; 1,3-dihydroxy-enzene; m-dihydroxybenzene;
3-hydroxyphenol;m-hydroxyphenol
|
|
3553
|
78-59-1
|
|